Cyrusher Ranger 2.0 vs Cyrusher Rover
Torque, battery, weight, pricing and features — side by side.
Change bikespick two, three or four to compare
Tip: choose bikes from different brands or spec tiers to see where torque-to-weight or battery-to-price ratios stand out.
Compare 3 or 4 bikes at once
Not indexed or listed in search results — a direct comparison you build and share, same as the two-bike one above.
High-step full-sus fat bike with Bafang 95Nm hub, 1040Wh battery, DNM air shock and turn signals
View details€2,299 Save €600 €2,899
Delivery: —
In stock at last check · checked
Full-suspension 26x4.0 fat bike with 95Nm hub, 811Wh battery, torque sensor and 100km range
View details€1,699 Save €100 €1,799
Delivery: —
In stock at last check · checked
Which should you choose?
Choose the Cyrusher Ranger 2.0 if…
…it carries a bigger battery (+229 Wh) and is lighter (0.3 kg lighter).
Choose the Cyrusher Rover if…
…it costs less (€600 cheaper).
Based only on the measured differences below — manufacturer-published figures, not independently tested.
At a glance
Cyrusher Ranger 2.0
High-step full-sus fat bike with Bafang 95Nm hub, 1040Wh battery, DNM air shock and turn signals
Cyrusher Rover
Full-suspension 26x4.0 fat bike with 95Nm hub, 811Wh battery, torque sensor and 100km range
| Spec | Cyrusher Ranger 2.0 | Cyrusher Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Best EU price | €2,299 | €1,699 €600 cheaper |
| RRP | €2,899 | €1,799 |
| Delivery | Delivery: — | Delivery: — |
| Availability at last check | In stock at last check — 17 Sep 2026 | In stock at last check — 17 Sep 2026 |
| Motor brand & type | Bafang Hub | Cyrusher Hub |
| Motor torque | 95 Nm | 95 Nm Same |
| Battery capacity | 1,040 Wh +229 Wh | 811 Wh |
| Voltage · amp-hours | 52 V · 20 Ah | 52 V · 15.6 Ah |
| Total weight | 39.3 kg 0.3 kg lighter | 39.6 kg |
| Frame type | High Step | High Step |
| Release | 17 January 2024 — 2 years, 8 months on market | December 2024 — 1 year, 9 months on market |
| Tyre size | Kenda 26" x 4.0" puncture-resistant fat tyres | 26" x 4.0" puncture-resistant fat tyres |
| Gears | Shimano CUES 9-speed | Shimano SL-TX50, 7-speed |
| Brakes | Tektro HD-E3940 4-piston hydraulic disc | Fully hydraulic disc brakes, 180mm front + rear |
| Max load | 158 kg (350 lbs) | 158 kg (350 lbs) |
| Top speed | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) | 25 km/h (15 mph) |
| Range | Up to 120 km (75 miles) | Up to 100 km (62 miles) |
| Colours | Green, White, Black | Blue, Green, Black |
| Charge time (stated) | 5-7 hours (52V 3.0A charger) | 7-9 hours (52V 2A charger) |
| Battery life | 800 charges | 800 cycles |
| Frame material | 6061 aluminium alloy, internal battery, 4-link rear suspension | 6061 aluminium alloy, internal battery |
| Display | 3.7" colour LCD smart computer | Mid-mounted colour LCD with USB |
| Front suspension | Hydraulic dual crown fork, lockout, 60mm travel | Oil & spring fork with adjustment and hydraulic lockout |
| Rear suspension | DNM air shock AO-38RC 165x28mm | Oil spring suspension 165x750 lbs |
| Safety | Built-in turn signals, integrated turn-signal tail light, motorcycle-style LED headlight | — |
| Lights | — | 3W LED headlight, integrated taillight with brake signal |
| Brake lights | No | Yes |
| Indicators | Yes | No |
Cyrusher Ranger 2.0 highlights
Cyrusher Rover highlights
Frequently asked questions
Which has more torque, Cyrusher Ranger 2.0 or Cyrusher Rover?
Both bikes are rated at 95 Nm of torque.
Which has the bigger battery, Cyrusher Ranger 2.0 or Cyrusher Rover?
The Cyrusher Ranger 2.0 has a larger battery at 1,040 Wh, versus 811 Wh on the Cyrusher Rover.
Which is lighter, Cyrusher Ranger 2.0 or Cyrusher Rover?
The Cyrusher Ranger 2.0 is lighter at 39.3 kg, compared to 39.6 kg on the Cyrusher Rover.
Which is cheaper, Cyrusher Ranger 2.0 or Cyrusher Rover?
The Cyrusher Rover is cheaper at €1,699, compared to €2,299 for the Cyrusher Ranger 2.0.
Pick one of the most-viewed matchups below or create your own comparison above.
More popular comparisons (42)
Browse the remaining reader-tested matchups included in our comparison directory.