18 active Cyrusher models compared, from $1,399 to $2,499.
Prices quoted in the written comparison below are the UK figures from our reference catalogue. The prices on each model card, and the price you will see when you follow a buy link, are the ones that store charges in its own currency.
Best overall
$1,899
The newest bike in the range and the clearest value in it: a 1,040 Wh battery — the largest Cyrusher fits to anything — where the only other models carrying that pack are the Trax 2.0 and Ranger 2.0. It has the dual cadence-and-torque sensor that defines the brand, full suspension, hydraulic discs and a step-through frame.
Drawback: At 39 kg it is among the heaviest bikes on this site. Plan for ground-floor or shed storage rather than carrying it upstairs.
Best value
Not sold in the US
The cheapest Cyrusher by a clear margin, and the only folding one — 28 kg, 20x3.0in fat tyres, front suspension and a 7-speed Shimano Tourney drivetrain.
Drawback: It is the exception to everything that makes the rest of the range distinctive: the only current Cyrusher without the dual cadence-and-torque sensor, and the only one without hydraulic disc brakes. You are paying less for a meaningfully different bike, not a smaller version of the same one.
Best for road and trail
$1,599
The only model in the range not on fat tyres — 27.5x2.6in instead — and the lightest of the dual-sensor bikes at 31 kg, with an 8-speed drivetrain where most of the range runs 7. That combination makes it the one Cyrusher that does not feel like a deliberate choice to ride slowly.
Drawback: The 720 Wh battery is the smallest of the dual-sensor models, so it trades range for the lower weight.
Decision fields only — best use, price, weight, battery, sensor, brakes, motor rating, claimed top speed, payload and road-legal status. Full specifications live on each bike's own page.
Cheapest and only folder; the one without the dual sensor
Not sold in the US
28 kg (62 lb) · 499 Wh
Newest model; 1,040 Wh battery at mid-range money
$1,899
39 kg (86 lb) · 1,040 Wh
Only non-fat-tyre model; lightest of the dual-sensor bikes
$1,599 · Out of stock
31 kg (68 lb) · 720 Wh
| Model | Best use | Price | Weight | Battery | Sensor | Brakes | Motor (continuous) | Claimed assist cut-off | Payload | Federal power check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cyrusher Loop 2.0 | Cheapest and only folder; the one without the dual sensor | Not sold in the US | 28 kg (62 lb) | 499 Wh | Cadence sensor | Mechanical disc | 250 W | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) | 120 kg | Within limit* |
| Cyrusher Rumble 2.0 | — | Not sold in the US | 31.9 kg (70 lb) | 864 Wh | — | — | 250 W | — | — | Within limit* |
| Cyrusher Zenith | High-step twin of the Aura, same price and spec | $1,399 | 34.3 kg (76 lb) | 780 Wh | Hybrid (torque + cadence) | Hydraulic disc 180mm (2-piston) | 250 W | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) | 150 kg | Within limit* |
| Cyrusher Aura | Step-through twin of the Zenith, dual sensor | $1,399 | 34.3 kg (76 lb) | 780 Wh | Hybrid (torque + cadence) | Hydraulic disc 180mm (2-piston) | 250 W | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) | 150 kg | Within limit* |
| Cyrusher Kommoda 3.0 | Full-suspension step-through, 960 Wh | $1,599 | 37.7 kg (83 lb) | 960 Wh | Hybrid (torque + cadence) | Hydraulic disc 180mm front + rear | 250 W | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) | 159 kg | Within limit* |
| Cyrusher Glider | Only longtail cargo model, 200 kg payload | $1,599 | 40.4 kg (89 lb) | 811 Wh | Hybrid (torque + cadence) | Hydraulic disc | 250 W | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) | 200 kg | Within limit* |
| Cyrusher Kommoda Pro | Newest model; 1,040 Wh battery at mid-range money | $1,899 | 39 kg (86 lb) | 1,040 Wh | Hybrid (torque + cadence) | Hydraulic disc 180mm front + rear | 250 W | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) | 150 kg | Within limit* |
| Cyrusher Roam | Step-through 26in fat bike, 811 Wh | $1,499 | 37 kg (82 lb) | 811 Wh | Hybrid (torque + cadence) | Hydraulic disc | 250 W | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) | 159 kg | Within limit* |
| Cyrusher Flex | Only non-fat-tyre model; lightest of the dual-sensor bikes |
$1,599
Out of stock · |
31 kg (68 lb) | 720 Wh | Hybrid (torque + cadence) | Logan fully hydraulic disc, 180mm front + rear | 250 W | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) | 158 kg | Within limit* |
| Cyrusher Nova | — | Not sold in the US | 25.6 kg (56 lb) | 540 Wh | Torque sensor | Hydraulic disc | 250 W | — | 159 kg | Within limit* |
| Cyrusher Rover | High-step 26in fat bike, 811 Wh | $1,699 | 39.6 kg (87 lb) | 811 Wh | Hybrid (torque + cadence) | Fully hydraulic disc brakes, 180mm front + rear | 250 W | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) | 158 kg | Within limit* |
| Cyrusher Sonder | — | Not sold in the US | 22.1 kg (49 lb) | 480 Wh | Torque sensor | Hydraulic disc | 250 W | — | 120 kg | Within limit* |
| Cyrusher Sprint | — | $1,399 | 32 kg (71 lb) | 720 Wh | Hybrid (torque + cadence) | Hydraulic disc | 250 W | — | 159 kg | Within limit* |
| Cyrusher Asuka | — | Not sold in the US | 24.9 kg (55 lb) | 504 Wh | Torque sensor | Hydraulic disc | 250 W | — | 159 kg | Within limit* |
| Cyrusher Trax 2.0 | Step-through flagship, 9-speed CUES, air shock | $2,499 | 39.3 kg (87 lb) | 1,040 Wh | Hybrid (torque + cadence) | Tektro HD-E3940 4-piston hydraulic disc | 250 W | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) | 158 kg | Within limit* |
| Cyrusher Ranger 2.0 | High-step twin of the Trax 2.0 | $2,499 | 39.3 kg (87 lb) | 1,040 Wh | Hybrid (torque + cadence) | Tektro HD-E3940 4-piston hydraulic disc | 250 W | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) | 158 kg | Within limit* |
| Cyrusher Quest | — | Not sold in the US | 47.3 kg (104 lb) | 960 Wh | Torque sensor | Hydraulic disc | 250 W | — | 200 kg | Within limit* |
| Cyrusher Trident | — | Not sold in the US | 46 kg (101 lb) | 1,040 Wh | Torque sensor | Hydraulic disc | 250 W | — | 200 kg | Within limit* |
*Continuous power and top speed are manufacturer-published figures, not independently tested by us. See the US road legality, model by model below before assuming any model is road-legal as-is.
Best for carrying things
The only longtail cargo bike Cyrusher makes, rated to 200 kg — the highest payload in the range by 40 kg — on a step-through frame with the 95 Nm motor and an 811 Wh battery.
Drawback: At 40.4 kg it is the heaviest bike in the range, and unlike most of its stablemates it is not full-suspension.
Best specified
The top of the range: 95 Nm, a 1,040 Wh battery, a DNM air shock, four-piston hydraulic brakes and a 9-speed Shimano CUES drivetrain where most of the range runs a 7-speed.
Drawback: It costs meaningfully more than the Kommoda Pro for the same battery capacity and the same torque figure — the money buys the drivetrain, shock and brakes, not more range or power.
These are the same bike in two frame styles, and the specification bears that out: the same price, identical 95 Nm motor and 780 Wh battery, identical 34.3 kg weight, the same 26x4.0in tyres, the same 7-speed Shimano drivetrain and the same 150 kg payload, both released in January 2026. The Aura is the step-through and the Zenith the step-over. Choose on how you get on and off a heavy bike, not on capability — there is no performance difference to weigh up, and nothing is gained by paying more attention to the comparison than that.
See the full Cyrusher Aura vs Cyrusher Zenith head-to-head →The same pattern again at the top of the range: the same price, both 95 Nm with a 1,040 Wh battery, both 39.3 kg, both on Kenda 26x4.0in puncture-resistant tyres with a 9-speed Shimano CUES drivetrain and a 158 kg payload. The Trax 2.0 is the step-through, the Ranger 2.0 the high-step. As with the Aura and Zenith, the decision is frame geometry alone.
See the full Cyrusher Trax 2.0 vs Cyrusher Ranger 2.0 head-to-head →This is the comparison worth actually thinking about, because a real price gap separates them and the headline numbers do not. Both carry the same 1,040 Wh battery — the biggest Cyrusher fits — and both are quoted at 85–95 Nm on a hub motor, so neither range nor pulling power is what you are buying. The Trax 2.0 spends the difference on hardware around the motor: a 9-speed Shimano CUES drivetrain against the Kommoda Pro's 7-speed, a DNM air shock, and four-piston brakes. If you ride varied terrain and want the gearing and damping, that is a real upgrade. If you mostly want the battery and the assistance, the Kommoda Pro delivers both for less.
See the full Cyrusher Kommoda Pro vs Cyrusher Trax 2.0 head-to-head →The clearest budget-versus-range decision Cyrusher offers. The Loop 2.0 folds and weighs 28 kg — the lightest bike in the range. The Kommoda 3.0 is 37.7 kg. Paying more buys the two things the Loop 2.0 does without: the dual cadence-and-torque sensor that is the reason to look at this brand at all, and hydraulic disc brakes instead of mechanical ones, plus almost double the battery (960 Wh against 499 Wh). If the folding frame is what you need, the Loop 2.0 is the only Cyrusher that offers it — but be clear you are giving up the brand's defining feature to get it.
See the full Cyrusher Loop 2.0 vs Cyrusher Kommoda 3.0 head-to-head →Cyrusher sells 18 current models in the US, spanning $1,399 to $2,499, through www.cyrusher.co.uk. This page compares every current model against every other so you can work out which one, if any, is actually the right buy — not just which one is cheapest.
The one fact that separates Cyrusher from every other brand here: 11 of its 18 models carry a dual cadence-and-torque sensor, letting the rider switch between assistance that scales to effort and assistance that arrives whenever the pedals turn. Across the whole catalogue we track, almost every dual-sensor bike is a Cyrusher — ADO, Engwe and Fiido currently offer none at all. If that switchable feel is what you are after, this is effectively the only brand on the site selling it in quantity. Every one of the 18 models also has suspension, which no other brand here manages across its whole range, and 10 of 18 ship hydraulic disc brakes.
The range is entirely hub-motor — there is no mid-drive Cyrusher — and 11 of the 18 models run fat tyres, the Flex being the single exception on 27.5x2.6in. Published payload runs up to 200 kg, on the Glider longtail. 1 of them were out of stock at our last check.
Where Cyrusher is a weaker fit: weight. These are heavy bikes — the range runs 22.1 kg to 47.3 kg, and everything except the entry-level folder sits above 30 kg. That is fine to ride and a genuine problem to store: carrying one upstairs is a two-person job, and lifting one onto a car rack is not something to plan around. The entry-level folder, the Loop 2.0, is also the exception to the brand's own strengths — no dual sensor and no hydraulic brakes — so the cheapest way into the range is not a smaller version of the rest of it.
Under US federal rules a low-speed electric bicycle has working pedals, a motor of no more than 750 W and a top speed under motor power alone of no more than 20 mph, and is treated as a bicycle rather than a motor vehicle. Your state then sorts eBikes into three classes by how fast the motor keeps helping — 20 mph for classes 1 and 2, 28 mph for class 3 — and sets its own rules on paths, helmets and minimum age, so the detail is state by state and worth checking where you ride.
Every one of the 18 active Cyrusher models we track publishes a continuous motor rating at or below 250 W — far inside the 750 W federal ceiling for a low-speed electric bicycle — and a claimed top assisted speed around 25 km/h (15.5 mph), which is below the 20 mph that separates the classes. That is manufacturer-published data, not something we have independently tested, and your state sets the rules that decide the rest. Check the current listing and manual for the specific bike before assuming either way.
| Model | Continuous power | Claimed top assisted speed | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cyrusher Loop 2.0 | 250 W | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) | Within limit* |
| Cyrusher Rumble 2.0 | 250 W | — | Within limit* |
| Cyrusher Zenith | 250 W | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) | Within limit* |
| Cyrusher Aura | 250 W | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) | Within limit* |
| Cyrusher Kommoda 3.0 | 250 W | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) | Within limit* |
| Cyrusher Glider | 250 W | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) | Within limit* |
| Cyrusher Kommoda Pro | 250 W | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) | Within limit* |
| Cyrusher Roam | 250 W | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) | Within limit* |
| Cyrusher Flex | 250 W | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) | Within limit* |
| Cyrusher Nova | 250 W | — | Within limit* |
| Cyrusher Rover | 250 W | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) | Within limit* |
| Cyrusher Sonder | 250 W | — | Within limit* |
| Cyrusher Sprint | 250 W | — | Within limit* |
| Cyrusher Asuka | 250 W | — | Within limit* |
| Cyrusher Trax 2.0 | 250 W | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) | Within limit* |
| Cyrusher Ranger 2.0 | 250 W | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) | Within limit* |
| Cyrusher Quest | 250 W | — | Within limit* |
| Cyrusher Trident | 250 W | — | Within limit* |
Editorial review: 24 August 2026
What Cyrusher does well: the dual cadence-and-torque sensor, on 11 of 18 models, is genuinely rare — the other brands we track offer virtually none between them, so if you want to switch between torque-scaled and cadence-triggered assistance this is where to look. Every model has suspension, which no other brand here manages range-wide, 10 of 18 ship hydraulic disc brakes, and payload runs to 200 kg on the Glider. Stock has been consistently good at our checks.
Where it compromises: weight, first and last — 22.1–47.3 kg, with everything bar the folder over 30 kg. There is no mid-drive option anywhere in the range, so hill-climbing is done on hub torque alone. The Loop 2.0 at the entry price drops both the dual sensor and the hydraulic brakes, making it a different proposition rather than a cheaper one. And the range contains genuine duplicates: the Aura and Zenith are the same bike in two frames at the same price, as are the Trax 2.0 and Ranger 2.0 — worth knowing before you spend time comparing them as if they were different products.
Who else to consider: if the dual sensor is not the priority and you want something lighter, our ADO buying guide covers a range averaging some 15 kg less per bike. For a wider spread of prices and frame types, see Engwe or Fiido. More broadly, browse cargo eBikes or eBikes with a torque sensor to see the whole field rather than one brand.
Most do, and unusually many carry a dual cadence-and-torque sensor that lets you choose how the assistance responds — more of the range than any other brand we list. Check the individual model, because the range is mixed.
They span a wide spread, from around 22 kg to over 47 kg. The fat-tyre models sit at the heavy end; check the listed weight on the model you are considering rather than assuming from the brand.
The Trident and the Quest, both mid-drives rated at 160 Nm — the highest torque figures of any bike in our catalogue.